[boner]

1. I hate the way he advertises his dumbass friend's party, and he desperately begs hot girls to email him and begs them to "Send a pic as not-a-dude insurance". Yeah that's going to be a pretty good insurance policy once some guys download some other girl's pic and send it to him. Going to be even better insurance policy once the transvestites start emailing him, equipped with Photoshop to touch up the rough spots.

2. I hate the way he deceives a girl into believing he was child-abused, then when she offers him constructive advice, he insults and ridicules her for believing his lie. Thanks, selfish Maddox; by encouraging your website viewers to distrust those who claim to have been child-abused, you have made it difficult for child-abuse victims everywhere to receive the help they need. But also have a look at the next point...

3. I hate the way he fantasises about hitting little children, and committing violence against them. Far from offering child-abuse victims support and assistance, I guess Maddox would much
rather be the perpetrator of child-abuse.

4. I hate the way he argues against vegetarianism by pointing out that rabbits are killed by the machines that harvest the crops eaten by vegetarians. Doesn't he realise that when a pound of wheat is compared to a pound of beef, not only were many more rabbits killed while harvesting the much larger amount of grain that the cow had to eat to produce that one kilogram of beef, but also, in addition to the rabbits being killed, the cow had to be slaughtered also? Yes a vegetarian diet does result in a few rabbits being accidentally killed, but Maddox claims that it must therefore be better to kill as many rabbits as possible, waste as much grain as possible, and on top of that slaughter cattle. But then I guess he's content to invoke that kind of logical fallacy, when the conclusion of the fallacious argument will be "I get to eat beef jerky".

5. And I hate the way that he claims that the grain fed to the livestock is of a different "grade" than the grain that humans eat. It's as though he's saying that it's necessary to feed all the grain of that "grade" to the livestock, no other options available. Doesn't he realise that the "grade" of the produce depends solely on how it is processed by the machinery at the processing plant? Merely change the settings on the machinery, Maddox, and you will have the "grade" of grain necessary for it to be consumed by humans. Really eliminates the need to feed it to the cattle, doesn't it?

6. Also, I hate the fact that he ignores the large-scale ecological consequences of a carnivorous diet. Doesn't he realise that when huge amounts of grain are being grown merely to feed the meat industry's livestock, all the available fertile land will become barren much more quickly than if it were only used to feed crop-derived products directly to humans? Then again, that's Maddox, the selfish dunce: too concerned about what's for dinner to care about what's left over in the world for the children and the grandchildren.

7. I hate the way he has such a chip on his shoulder from high school, and has to make up stories fantasising about how the high school jocks who bullied him might become bald impotent cleaners with no life. You know, even though Maddox believes that all the jocks have failed in life, probably the jocks are right now walking through the shopping mall while buying expensive crap on their credit cards and slapping their attractive girlfriends' asses, smoking cigars and walking out the door to their expensive sports cars while dropping all the shit on the ground that the bald cleaner then has to clean up. Yeah, the jocks are probably the ones who drove noisily past Maddox's fat ass and shouted obscenities at him while he walked along on the sidewalk looking like shit.

8. I hate the way that despite his blatant disregard for any kind of morality, ethics or decency, he's still such a coward as to always uphold the law. For instance, when someone asked him about rape in the military, he firstly shouted out some crude description about a "vagina", and then he basically said that since rape is against the law, no-one should be allowed to do it. Well forget about the law, Maddox; what if someone actually deserves to be raped, what then? For instance, if Maddox has a girlfriend then she must be a total bitch, and so she would deserve a good raping.

9. I hate the way he responded to an email that was written in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. Basically when responding to that email, Maddox firstly pointed out the fact that the email was written with the caps lock turned on, and then he called the guy an idiot, and again called the guy an idiot, and a few more times called the guy an idiot. Whoa that's an original response Maddox, just call the guy an idiot as much as possible, and then stop writing.

10. I hate his goddamn laziness. The more popular his site becomes, the less effort he puts into it. Did you notice that even though he used to make full colour pictures, he now only draws poor quality black-and-white sketches in MSPaint? Bloody moron, I guess he only cares about earning money off his piece of shit book.

11. I hate his illogical claim that he commands more marketing power than McDonalds. He claimed that he achieved a higher Alexa traffic-rank than McDonalds in the year 2003, even though McDonalds spent over $500 million on advertising during that year and he didn't spend anything. But doesn't he realise that the Alexa site provided him the traffic ranking for the whole xmission.com domain, not just the maddox subdomain of xmission? It's true, Alexa ranks maddox.xmission.com the same as xmission.com (the latter typed in without the maddox subdomain). That means it's not just Maddox's site being measured, it's also the traffic ranking of the xmission webhosting provider.
That overexaggerated traffic-rank pretty much destroys Maddox's claim to factual credibility.

12. Furthermore, did you realise that in his misleading bar-graph, where he pretended to be more powerful than KFC, Burger King and various other corporations, he quoted the entire amount that each corporation spent on advertising per annum, not limited to the internet? So he's including all the print advertising, all the billboard advertising, all the TV advertising, and so on. And when you realise that all of that advertising wasn't even meant to promote their website, but rather, to encourage people to buy Coca-Cola and Pepsi drinks, and to come to Subway restaurants and McDonalds and Wendy's, you can see why their websites aren't as popular as they might be. Those corporations don't care about their websites, they only care about their sales figures for their drinks and fast-food.

13. And even when Maddox states specifically the $1.2 million McDonalds spent on internet promotions alone (a figure far less than the huge $548 million he cited in his bar graph!) he didn't specify whether those promotions were designed to bring traffic to the McDonalds website, or whether, as was more likely, they were just internet advertisements on sites not controlled by McDonalds, designed to attract people to the McDonalds fast-food outlets and not to the McDonald's website. McDonalds don't even care about making their website more popular than Maddox's site. But that's Maddox, always factually inaccurate whenever he can make a superficial show of pretense--I wonder how much progress he's made in his university studies with a cavalier attitude like that?

14. I hate the way he claims to have created the "Best Page In The Universe". Don't kid yourself Maddox, your website is poorly designed, ignorantly written piece of shit, and anyone with that elusive thing called talent could have done a much better job of it. I might see if I can do a job of pointing out how crap it is, though...

15. I hate the way he ruins a good argument by acting like an idiot. For instance, after successfully pointing out a "Mac Fix It Forums" site for macintosh computer trouble and thus rebutting the Mac users' claim that "It just works", he goes ahead and ruins his argument by making stupid outbursts like "Waaaah, boo hoo!" and "Fuck you." Just stick with the argument, Maddox, because your slapstick theatrics sure as hell aren't funny!

16. And I hate the way that he only had a limited supply of good arguments against the mentally deficient Mac users, so he had to insert stupid garbage like: "I don't know why Mac users get so defensive when you call them idiots." Try calling Maddox an idiot; he will probably publish your email on his site, become extremely hyperaggressive and fire off an insulting response calling you names. Yeah, maybe Maddox should try selecting a computer from the Macintosh line of children's toys, he might find that he actually likes that stupid inane Mac shit being smeared all over his face.

17. I hate the way he criticises Mac users for buying a Mac computer and feeling that they are "part of the Mac community". Yeah we know Mac users are incompetent and vain, but what about when Maddox then declares that Apple is "selling a way of life, and I'm not ready to be that heavily invested in a product"? Doesn't he realise that if his readers weren't investing themselves in his website, and his books, and his cheap t-shirts, then he wouldn't be famous and he'd be living in cheap accommodation with only some low-paying programming job keeping him off the streets? Yeah, Maddox will definitely be screwed if people ever decide not to invest themselves in HIS ridiculous products.

18. I hate the way he degrades Star Wars Episode III, calling it a "steaming pile of Sith" and claiming that it has "dialogue clumsy enough to warrant putting a handicap sticker on George Lucas' car". Damn, Maddox, George Lucas' plot points and dialogue will always make a hell of a lot more sense than your absurd illogical website.

19. I hate the way he is an incompetent film critic, also, and is unable to follow the plot of the Star Wars movies. For instance, he says: "Anakin is on a mission to save his wife, Padme, from certain death! Or at least likely death. Okay, it was a dream." And he claims that because it was just a dream, Anakin shouldn't have acted on it. But Maddox, why didn't you observe that Anakin specifically characterised his dream as being indistinguishably similar to his previous dreams about his mother's death, dreams that DID come true? And why didn't you listen to the parts in the previous movies that clearly explained that Anakin has the highest midichlorian count ever, enabling him to "see things before they happen", a fact that confirms his excellent predictive capacity? Yeah, I guess you weren't paying attention during those parts of the movies, and you were probably thinking way too much about that "handicap sticker" that would be better applied to YOU.

20. I hate the way he cannot restrain himself from using gratuitously vulgar descriptions, such as: "you could sell these people hookers in a vagina storm". And I could quote some things he has written that are far more revolting than that, but I suffered recently food poisoning from an untrustworthy restaurant and I really don't want to have to vomit again.

21. And why does Maddox insult his readers so much? For instance, he makes the following insult: "this man is British, which makes you a presumptuous cock." What I want to know is: do all of Maddox' readers now agree with him that they themselves are "presumptuous cocks"? You have insulted yourselves by supporting this man who will casually insult you whenever he pleases. Did none of you have any self-esteem to begin with?


22. I hate the way he uses redundant arguments. For instance, he says that "the label "African American" is the dumbest, most persistently used phrase in our vernacular." But then he justifies that statement by complaining that anyone using the phrase "African American" is assuming that the person they're referring to is 1. American, and 2. of African racial origin. Well obviously Maddox, that's the meaning of
the term! And what about people who are Americans but are also derived from the African black people, both of those criteria being met by the vast majority of black people in the USA? what about when someone calls one of those people an "African American",
is that "dumb" to use that label? I'd call it a completely accurate label, myself.

23. I hate the way that even though he finds a great subject for parody he just parodies it in a stupid way; for instance on one of his pages he refers to a clause in the iTunes end user licence agreement saying that "You also agree that you will not use these products for ... the development, design, manufacture or production of missiles, or nuclear, chemical or biological weapons." Whoa, well we all know you can't use some goddamn MP3 program to construct a nuclear missile, but then Maddox goes and makes the following sarcastic statement: "If I want to manufacture biological weapons with my copy of iTunes, I will, fascists." Hell, Maddox, can't you at least ridicule the Apple corporation without coming off sounding like Saddam Hussein? And you sound like a hypocrite, describing Apple as "fascists" while facetiously intending to manufacture your own fascist biological weapons. But I guess what Maddox really wants is to become dictator and enact a policy of "Nuke the Whales".

24. I hate his narrow, self-centred worldview. Example: "There are only three reasons you should ever be this delighted about anything, and all of them involve you being a hot chick, meeting me, and lube." Yeah, that's the limit of Maddox's scope of thought.

25. I hate the way he reveals way too much information about his body parts. It's not just when he describes their appearance, as in when he says "My balls are huge" or when he says that he has a "small penis and a hairy back". No, it really gets obscene when he starts describing what he does with them, like when he says "I've typed out more coherent sentences with my penis", or "I'm going to go do something less painful like stick my dick in the oven". Damn, I really hope he never asks anyone else to use his soiled keyboard or oven.

26. I hate the way he sometimes has all the wrong revenge ideas. For instance, he quoted from some bitchy female publication saying that young women should expect their boyfriends to "React so cutely when you hit him and it actually hurts." Damn, that's unacceptable female dominant aggression right there, and we all agree that the man shouldn't react "cutely" and submissively accept it. But Maddox's only alternative is "putting them in a head lock and making them eat ants and/or spiders while you give them carpet burn." Why can't he think of something better, such as to say to the out-of-control girlfriend: "Why the hell did you hit me, was that an invitation for sex? Well invitation accepted bitch, I'd better stick my dick in you right now!" Or it would be possible to pretend to be passively accepting the abuse and acting "cutely", and walking away "cutely", but then grabbing a dildo and walking right back up to her and shoving the dildo down her throat? Yeah, come on Maddox, you don't have to be so boringly equalitarianistic; take revenge against her in a way uniquely applicable to depraved abusive young women!

27. I hate the way he sometimes writes pages that undermine victims of abuse, and then when someone emails him to protest, he responds in a totally worthless way that isn't even funny. For instance, someone sent him an email replying to some page he wrote about a young girl who had been kidnapped, and the email raised some valid concerns like "You have no idea exactly what that girl went through, nor do
you know what you would do in an extreme situation like that", but at the end of the email Maddox just replied by saying "No". Not funny, no respect nor even any evidence of consideration of anything that was written in the email. What the hell are you doing Maddox; can't you take the time to think and write more than one word?

28. I hate how he responded to an email where the guy who sent it to him said he really liked "kicking the shit out of computer science fags". Maddox didn't even understand what he was saying, and responded by asking him: "So are you saying that all programmers are gay, or that you enjoyed "kicking the shit out of" the gay ones?" But Maddox then realised that it probably wasn't the second option because the guy probably was beating all the programmers and not just the ones who were homosexual. So hey, Maddox, maybe that guy was using the word "fags" in a figurative way, claiming that even if the computer science students aren't homosexual, they still act like homosexuals. Yeah, that makes sense, unlike the two options you gave. Trust you to ignore the option that makes sense, and focus on the two alternatives that don't.

29. I hate the way he disrespects a good decent-sounding guy who wrote him a very well-considered and thoughtful, if critical, email. The email rightfully called Maddox "incredibly ignorant and petty", and pointed out Maddox's tendency to "bitch and moan about everything". And even though the guy writing the email took a superior, condescending attitude, telling Maddox "I have accomplished more in my young life than you ever will", who can blame him given that Maddox is such a contemptible individual. But Maddox then decides to belittle the guy, identifying some of the easiest classes from the guy's college degree and using them to jump to the conclusion "Congratulations! You're mediocre", and to accuse the guy of being a "lazy unmotivated dumbass" without any evidence to support that claim. The guy replied by perspicaciously observing that Maddox is "a puppet of our pop-culture views of wit and talent." Then when Maddox asked some of the people viewing his website to spam the guy and harass the guy at his work email account, the guy responds in a perfectly understandable way, really: he says ""Maddox, I am sincerely apologetic... Please please take it down. If you any shred of decency please. This is all wrong. Please take it off". And I really agree with the guy that it was "wrong"; what business had Maddox in acting so spitefully towards him? No wait, Maddox was just being bitter as usual, thus confirming the guy's point that Maddox is "incredibly ignorant and petty". Yeah.

30. I hate the way he picks on obvious targets. For instance, he said this: "the difficulty level is hard. Harder than a priest at a playground." Well come on, a priest wouldn't even be at a playground wearing his priest outfit and rubbing his crotch, unless there were no cops, OR parents within a ten mile radius. No, I think we need to be more concerned about the maintenance man installing electricity cables and occasionally installing himself in children who have wandered away from the playground; also we need to think about the loitering guy in a raincoat who occasionally strikes up conversations with the kids in a perverted and homosexual way. Yes, these are the true pedophiles, not some priest who stakes his church reputation by acting suspiciously in playgrounds. Try being a bit more subtle, Maddox.

31. And then when Maddox does write a page about "How to spot a pedophile", he just talks trash. He says that if a criminal suspect is smiling, it must be a "pedo-smile" and the suspect has got to be a pedophile, but if the suspect has a neutral expression or is frowning then there's no way they could be a pedophile. But the only evidence Maddox even provides is some photos of convicted pedophiles smiling, and then some photos of criminals who are not pedophiles who have a neutral expression or are frowning. So I guess he just looked through all the photos of each criminal, and if they were a pedophile he chose the photo where they were smiling, and if they were never convicted of pedophile crimes then he just chose a photo where they weren't smiling. Also, if there were any pedophiles who never smiled in any of their photos, then Maddox would have just left them off the list, and if any criminals who weren't pedophiles smiled in all their photos then he wouldn't have included them either. Whoa, way to bias the evidence in your favour, Maddox.

32. I hate the way he makes up for lack of good material by spoiling movies. That's right, Maddox usually informs everyone who reads his page about who dies or whatever else happens at the end of the movie. Take his "Matrix: Revolutions" review, where even though he says that the entire movie "is boring and shitty", he still has to go and say what happens in the ending. Well get your act together Maddox, movies that are boring and lame spoil themselves, they don't need you to spoil them. Come to think of it, you only need to post the spoilers to attract more controversy to your idiotic website.

33. Chuck Norris. Why the hell does Maddox speak so highly about Chuck Norris? Doesn't he even realise that Chuck Norris is a damn Christian, who kneels before the image of Jesus? So although Maddox in his "Alphabet of Manliness" book says that Chuck Norris "uses hippies as firewood", I damn well hope that in that circumstance Norris can pretend he's doing a witch-burning or some such pernicious religious garbage, because it's damn unlikely that Norris would even be able to say he wants to burn hippies without coming off as a complete hypocrite who is in violation of his moralising religious belief.

34. Speaking of the "Alphabet of Manliness", why don't we think about whether Maddox's ideas are really as "manly" as he claims? For example, under the letter "S" he talks about "sneaking a peek". Whoa, that sounds manly, sneaking around surreptitiously like a COWARD. No, really, forget about looking up women's skirts, Maddox; there are other alternatives, like, I don't know... GETTING LAID? You know, that task that is far more difficult (and manly) than whatever semi-challenging video game you were wasting your time on lately?

35. I hate the way he criticises cars and can only criticise one of them by referring to an obscure "bumblebee" character from some old Transformers cartoon. Damn, Maddox, when the hell was that cartoon made, was it 1980 or something? And does anyone with a life remember all the characters in that cartoon? Probably not, but that doesn't stop Maddox from rambling on and naming his two favourite characters from that cartoon, and then when he actually manages to criticise the car he's supposed to be criticising, all he can manage to say is that the car "sucks rhinoceros cock" and is a "piece of shit". Damn that looks as though it is really intelligent criticism, Maddox.

36. I hate the way he proclaims confidently that "There is no 9/11 conspiracy you morons" but then he doesn't even prove it. For instance, he said that since some guy who posted a conspiracy video didn't get assassinated, there couldn't be any conspiracy. Wrong, Maddox! They may think his video is too insignificant and unpopular to pose a threat, or they may think that it couldn't do anything just as long as it stays on the internet and not on the tv news or any other mainstream media that people might be viewing as trustworthy and reliable. Of course, we all know what Maddox has done for the internet's reputation of being trustworthy and reliable, and let's just say he hasn't done it any favours. But see the next point...

37. I hate the way he blows things out of proportion, claiming that if the 9/11 terrorist attacks were orchestrated by the US government as an in-job, then a huge number of people must know about it. For instance, he claims: "thousands of FBI agents, firefighters, demolition experts, scientists, CIA, rescue workers, police, airline pilots, NSA, the majority of the House of Representatives, air traffic control, high-level military contractors, and the entire Bush administration" must have known about the attack. No Maddox, that's bullshit as usual, and if you actually think about it only a few people would have needed to know: a few of the top CIA agents to orchestrate it, a few of the top government administrators to order it, a few complicit terrorists to execute it, and a few more to plant explosives in WTC7 and in other buildings, using the explosives to aid the collapse. That's all it takes to pull it off, just a handful. All the firefighters and everyone else have no idea who's behind it, they just clean up the mess as they're supposed to.


38. And he even claims that if the USA government was capable of pulling off 9/11, then they would also be capable of shutting down every 9/11 conspiracy video or conspiracy website, and they would have shut down many of them. No they wouldn't Maddox, they don't want to blow their cover. The more websites they shut down, the more likely people are to ask questions, and the more risk they take of being exposed. Don't think that the people running these websites and making these videos don't have friends and family who would wonder why the webhosting company was mysteriously forced to take down the website. Or why every time one of them creates a new conspiracy site, military agents keep breaking down the door, and pointing guns at them and ABDUCTING whoever was responsible for the site.

39. I hate the way he frequently criticises the spelling and grammar of the emails he gets. Damn Maddox, you always have to take the easy way out when you can't find any fault whatsoever with the subject matter of the email. But when wit runs out, I guess it's always good to know that you can take an email and criticise its grammar by saying "that's technically not a question without a question mark, is it dipshit?" If you can tell it was a question then it didn't even need the question-mark, Maddox, which begs the question of why you have to whine so much like a Microsoft spell-checker.

40. Now we already know about Maddox's latent ambitions for fascist power, but what about when he claims that "civil obedience is still disobedience" and in true dictator style demands that no public protests be allowed, and then goes on to complain that "You can add the word "civil" to any crime ... and suddenly it has a positive connotation?" Try "civil war" Maddox, I don't think that one has a positive connotation. Or ask George W. Bush in his next interview session about the connotation of "civil war", and after standing there silently for about eight minutes thinking, he will realise that civil war is a very bad thing and arrest you for terrorism. Or civil disobedience.

41. I hate the way his popularity has gotten the better of his sense of humour. When he wrote about "How to kill yourself like a man", he just wrote some really unoriginal garbage like "Bang your head repeatedly on a stool." Maddox, Maddox, you are supposed to try to actually be FUNNIER than the masses of people visiting your site. I think the ones who email you probably make far better jokes in their emails. Then again, probably not, because if they had you would probably have plagiarised them.

42. And speaking of plagiarism, I hate the way Maddox responds to an email that pointed that one of his new pages was far too similar to a George Carlin routine. Basically Maddox just criticised the spelling and grammar of the email, and called the person who wrote the email a "dipshit". So you steal from professional comedians Maddox, and then when you write something yourself it is not funny and is unoriginal. Yeah, great work.

43. I hate the way he starts making pedantic criticisms about pronunciation, and then starts criticising people who don't even deserve it. It is fair enough for him to say that people who pronounce the acronym "URL" as "ERL" or "Earl" are dumb, but then he goes and slams programmers who pronounce the variable type "char" in such a way so that it sounds similar to "chart". Come on Maddox, are they supposed to cumbersomely say the whole word "Character" every time they want to refer to that variable? Actually I don't know what you think they're supposed to do, because you sure as hell didn't provide any sample alternative pronunciation.

44. Also on the subject of pronunciation, it is fair enough for him to say that people who use the phrase "killer app" in a figurative sense are shallowly disregarding the fact that that phrase is specifically
referring to a "killer computer application". But then Maddox clearly cared nothing about shallow exaggerations of meaning when he claimed people who pronounce "URL" as "earl" invoke "contempt for humanity". Keep your judgements a lot more moderate than that Maddox, unless
a poor pronunciation is really the most serious moral offense you can think of. And I doubt it is, given that your website is a far more obscene abomination.

45. I hate the way he can be so obtuse in criticising things. For instance, he says that a man who is "Metrosexual" is really a "gay guy still in the closet". No Maddox, they might be heterosexual, and in fact the whole point in making the word "Metrosexual" sound like "heterosexual" is to attract straight guys into buying designer clothing, and spending money on expensive haircuts, and funding the fashion industry, and giving their money to all the goddamn commercial advertisers who invented this whole "Metrosexual" concept in the first place as a means to make greater profit. Yeah, that's what "Metrosexual" is really about, it's an advertising gimmick. But could we expect Maddox to even provide the briefest analysis into the profiteering tactics of corporations and advertising agencies? I guess not.

46. Now it's unclear if he ever makes false statements in his pages to make his writing rhetorically sound better, but take his page about "Unintentionally sexual comic book covers" where he claims that he found all the cover art while "going through a stash of old comic books". Notice that further down the page, he describes one of the comic book covers by saying "the spanking on the cover implies that Superboy has indeed done something to earn the title of a "bad boy;" perhaps in between brief stints of preventing robbers from burglarizing booty, Superboy was caught robbing booty from burglars." Maddox, why do you have to guess what the comic book's plot is? Why can't you actually look inside the comic book and read all the plot points that are in that issue? Or did you never own that comic book in the first place, and did you just get all the images you used by ripping them off from some other website? Probably.

47.
And on that same page, he includes a scan of a comic book called "Blek le Roc", and he says that it is a "French comic that comes from an artist whose work first appeared in a magazine called 'Pim, Pam, Poum, Pipo'". Why the hell did would anyone in the USA own a copy of an obscure French-language comic book published in France called "Blek le Roc", Maddox? Oh wait, I forgot it wasn't even a real stash of comic books you were talking about. Dumbass.

48. I hate the way he loses his sense of humour and misses obvious jokes. For instance, he shows us a comic book cover (image probably scanned by someone else and ripped off, of course) that has a cowboy and a boy standing next to him, and the boy is holding wood next to the cowboy's crotch and unintentionally making it look like the wood is the cowboy's erect penis, and the boy and cowboy are smiling at each other in a very strange way. All Maddox even says about that picture is: "It's every man's dream to have a penis so large that he must hire a small boy to carry it." Damn Maddox, didn't you think that the man might get the small boy to do something more pedophilic and illegal than just carrying it? Show some comic imagination, for hell's sake!

49. I hate the way that for no reason, and for no comic value, he just goes and calls Bill O'Reilly a "big blubbering vagina" and accuses him of needing "tampons to help with his constant PMS". What the hell was that about, Maddox? You had a really good page going for once, making legitimate criticisms against Bill O'Reilly, and then you go and blow it with some stupid tampon photograph and spurious nonsensical descriptions of Bill O'Reilly as a "cry-baby bitch". Next time you are capable of writing a good page, you should stay on topic all the way to the end.

50. I hate the way he is inconsistent with his research, sometimes researching things way too thoroughly such as when he quotes the precise speed at which fire spreads, but sometimes refusing to research things of which he is ignorant. For instance, he says about Keanu Reeves' first name: "what kind of name is that anyway? Sounds like a foreign car company". I just did a google search for "Keanu Reeves", and in less than half a minute I easily found out that the name Keanu is "a derivation of Reeves' great-great-uncle Keaweaheulu, whose name means "cool breeze over the mountains" in Hawaiian.
" That's how easy it is to research some of these things. Damn it, Maddox, why can't you at least make a consistent effort?

...Whoa, I hate the way he has so much utter nonsense on his website to allow me to easily write 50 points about what a damn fool he is. Why are you making it so easy for me, Maddox? Come on, give me a challenge at least.

...Looks I've already done 50 of them, but hey here's just one last thing I hate: I hate the way he says "If you disagree with anything you find on this page, you are wrong". For obvious reasons, I think. Or at least, Maddox gives his readers plenty of obvious reasons to disagree with him. "The most disagreeable page in the universe."

[Angry_Jerk]

tl;dr
_________________
Russell likes to hurt people... for peace.

[dreadnought]

Jesus christ when do you faggots ever learn?
_________________
FORUMS OG CRU

DO COKE FUCK BITCHES FIGHT FOR THE TRU ARYAN RACE ALL DAY SCARBRO REPRESENT 416 nigggggga

[Conterbob_2]

WTFL;DR(WAY TOO FUCKING LONG, DIDN'T READ)

[Mixolydian Quijote]

This guy is good. I am not going to argue against those points as they are too many.
_________________
HU H?IS A PENIS

(this is Crack City Rocker aka Victory Pirate)

[Raquel]

[(___(___)]

I read his whole post.
_________________
The Best Avatar In the Universe 1: http://img437.imageshack.us/img437/6892/assmanavatarepsone5lx.gif
The Best Avatar in the Universe 2: http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/3927/assmanavatarepstwo3ub.gif

[Zoghade]

[boner]

[Raquel]

Actually I agree with most of it, I just found the comment about blowing things out of proportion to be funny.

[Jimmy Reptile]

I read the first sentence of about half of these -- the other half was somewhat interesting.

Of all of it I probably only agree with 2 or 3 points. The rest just sounds like whiny crap and things that if taken away would make Maddox significantly less funny.

Perhaps I'll make a more lengthy reply later, it is Sunday, or I'll just get lazy and do nothing.

[ForumPoster]

The author of this posts points out a lot of great points. In my opinion, maddox writes these articles for shock value, not to go out and do them. God, do people take everything so literal, like the article about punishing your children. If you really believe in "dragon kick" or whatever the hell he wrote about then you need to turn your computer off and start watching some television. It's just for laughs. Do I believe that maddox is an advocate of violence against all human species? Yes, but the author maddox is probably different from George Ouzonian. He's just creating a voice, and hell if you don't like it you can write out a long essay explaining your qualms.

Nearly everyone that reads his writing takes it in two senses: "I'm offended literally" and "I'm going to work his every thought into my day-to-day life." Read it and either laugh or close your browser. If he had been in jail for every known crime committable by man, then it'd be different. But he's not (I'm making an assumption here).

No, I'm not some huge supporter or super-fan. I read these boards every now and then when I'm bored, and enjoy some of his articles--because I can find humor in some things. Sure, he probably cuts corners in arguments, but so do a lot of people. We will never get a fair debate.

I didn't buy the book, I read through it Barnes and Nobles one day, it was pretty funny. I could spend all day pointing out technical flaws or comedic flaws or artistic flaws or whatever. I'm not, though. I just don't care about it, hell you could write anything on anybody in the world pointing out all their wrong-doings. It's pointless.

[Romulux]

Now just out of curiosity......how long did that take to write?
_________________
Your funeral was boring... Cuz yer dumb

[boner]

Took several hours to write.

It may be that some of Maddox's offensive viewpoints are insincere and intended only for humour, but then the problem is that it's hard to determine whether that is the case. When he talks about hitting children and makes false arguments against vegetarianism, for all I know he really does fantasise about hitting children and believes in the false arguments. That's the real problem, that there's no indication that his viewpoints are less than sincere.

[Bloodmore]

[Huh?]

He means he's not sure if he could get through it all without his brain going numb and caving in on itself.

I skimmed it, reasons 19 and 20 are pretty much all you need to know.

[Romulux]

[Judas]

I read it all during a boring hour at work, and I must say I enjoyed it, even if some/many/all of the points are arguable.

[Ilikeyuo]

i hate madox
_________________

[boner]